Timesys vs Data Respons: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Timesys (4.2/5) edges ahead of Data Respons (3.9/5) overall. Timesys is the better choice for teams needing long-term embedded Linux security patching as a dedicated specialty. Data Respons is the stronger option for nordic teams wanting scale with (so far) retained embedded specialist focus. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Timesys vs Data Respons: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Timesys | Data Respons |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1996 | 1986 |
| HQ | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA | Høvik, Norway |
| Team size | 51–200 | 1,400 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Nearly three-decade specialization in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring) most generalist firms treat as an afterthought, now under Lynx Software Technologies | 1,400-person embedded specialist that has retained a genuinely focused practice through two ownership transitions, rather than being folded into a diversified engineering pool |
| Pricing model | Engineering services, tooling licenses | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux (Yocto), C/C++, Linux kernel security patching | Embedded Linux, C/C++, RTOS |
| Industries served | Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking, Consumer Electronics | Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime, Medtech, Defense & Security |
Timesys vs Data Respons: overview
Timesys
Timesys Corporation was founded in 1996 by principals associated with Carnegie Mellon University's real-time systems research and built one of the first real-time-enhanced embedded Linux distributions. Headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania with roughly 60 employees, the company's specialty — embedded Linux security patching and long-term maintenance — is a specific, underserved niche most generalist firms treat as an afterthought. In December 2023, Lynx Software Technologies acquired Timesys; buyers should confirm directly how much of the original specialist team and focus remains post-acquisition, since integration into a larger organization is exactly the kind of dilution risk a boutique buyer is trying to avoid by choosing a specialist in the first place.
Data Respons
Data Respons, founded in 1986 and headquartered in Høvik, Norway, develops embedded systems across eight regulated sectors, employing roughly 1,400 people. At 1,400 people, it's larger than any true boutique on this list, but the practice remains genuinely embedded-focused rather than folded into a diversified engineering pool — a distinction worth checking directly given two ownership transitions in five years (AKKA Technologies in 2020, then folded into Akkodis), since integration into ever-larger parent organizations is the specific dilution risk a specialist-seeking buyer should watch for.
Services and capabilities: Timesys vs Data Respons
| Capability | Timesys | Data Respons |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✗ | ✓ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✗ | ✓ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Timesys vs Data Respons
| Framework / platform | Timesys | Data Respons |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | N/A | N/A |
| Bluetooth | N/A | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | N/A | N/A |
| Verilog | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Timesys vs Data Respons
| Criterion | Timesys | Data Respons |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Engineering services, Tooling/licensing | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Timesys vs Data Respons
| Dimension | Timesys | Data Respons |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking | Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime |
| Best use cases | Products with long product-support commitments needing ongoing embedded Linux CVE monitoring and patching from a dedicated specialist, Real-time Linux systems needing specialist kernel-level engineering from a team with research-grade origins | Maritime or defense programs needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity, Medtech products requiring embedded engineering from a multi-sector specialist team with a long independent operating history |
| Typical project type | Engineering services | Fixed project |
Timesys vs Data Respons: pros and cons
| Timesys | |
|---|---|
| + | Explicit specialty in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring) that most embedded agencies, boutique or generalist, treat as an afterthought |
| + | Carnegie Mellon-linked founding team gives the company real-time Linux research credibility dating to the mid-1990s |
| + | Long operating history (since 1996) means extensive documentation and tooling maturity |
| - | Acquired by Lynx Software Technologies in December 2023 — confirm directly how much of the original specialist team and focus remains, since post-acquisition dilution is a real risk for boutique-specialist buyers |
| - | Team size (~60) caps capacity for large concurrent programs relative to bigger engineering firms |
| - | No public pricing or minimum engagement figures for pre-qualification |
| Data Respons | |
|---|---|
| + | Nearly 40 years of embedded systems specialization across eight distinct sectors, from maritime to medtech to defense |
| + | Nordic regional presence (Norway, Sweden, Denmark) plus Germany and Taiwan offices supports European and APAC delivery |
| + | Retains a genuinely embedded-focused delivery team despite two ownership transitions (AKKA in 2020, then Akkodis) |
| - | Two ownership transitions in five years (AKKA Technologies 2020, then folded into Akkodis) — confirm current team continuity directly, since parent-organization dilution is a real risk at this stage |
| - | 1,400-employee scale sits below the largest global engineering firms for very large concurrent programs |
| - | No public pricing or minimum engagement figures published |
Who should choose Timesys?
A typical fit: products with long product-support commitments needing ongoing embedded Linux CVE monitoring and patching from a dedicated specialist.
Nearly three-decade specialization in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring) most generalist firms treat as an afterthought, now under Lynx Software Technologies. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking, Consumer Electronics.
Who should choose Data Respons?
A typical fit: maritime or defense programs needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity.
1,400-person embedded specialist that has retained a genuinely focused practice through two ownership transitions, rather than being folded into a diversified engineering pool. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime, Medtech, Defense & Security.
Decision matrix: Timesys vs Data Respons
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Data Respons |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Data Respons |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Timesys (Not disclosed) vs Data Respons (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Data Respons |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Timesys |
Use case fit: Timesys vs Data Respons
| Use case | Timesys fit | Data Respons fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Products with long product-support commitments needing ongoing embedded Linux CVE monitoring and patching from a dedicated specialist | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Real-time Linux systems needing specialist kernel-level engineering from a team with research-grade origins | Strong | Limited | Timesys |
| Maritime or defense programs needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity | Limited | Strong | Data Respons |
| Medtech products requiring embedded engineering from a multi-sector specialist team with a long independent operating history | Limited | Strong | Data Respons |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Timesys vs Data Respons
Timesys (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Development projects. Nearly three-decade specialization in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring) most generalist firms treat as an afterthought, now under Lynx Software Technologies.
Data Respons (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need medtech products requiring embedded engineering from a multi-sector specialist team with a long independent operating history. If your situation matches that, Data Respons is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Timesys vs Data Respons FAQ
Is Timesys better than Data Respons?
Timesys (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Timesys's strongest advantage: explicit specialty in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring) that most embedded agencies, boutique or generalist, treat as an afterthought. Data Respons's strongest advantage: nearly 40 years of embedded systems specialization across eight distinct sectors, from maritime to medtech to defense.
How do Timesys and Data Respons differ in pricing?
Timesys uses engineering services, tooling licenses pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Data Respons uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Timesys or Data Respons?
Timesys is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Timesys and Data Respons?
Timesys's primary differentiator is: nearly three-decade specialization in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring) most generalist firms treat as an afterthought, now under Lynx Software Technologies. Data Respons's primary differentiator is: 1,400-person embedded specialist that has retained a genuinely focused practice through two ownership transitions, rather than being folded into a diversified engineering pool. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 1,400), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Industrial IoT, Medical devices vs Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.