Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Timesys (4.2/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for teams wanting specialist depth with capacity for multi-workstream programs. Timesys is the stronger option for teams needing long-term embedded Linux security patching as a dedicated specialty. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1996 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | 51–200 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients | Nearly three-decade specialization in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring) most generalist firms treat as an afterthought, now under Lynx Software Technologies |
| Pricing model | Technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development | Engineering services, tooling licenses |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Embedded Linux (Yocto) | Embedded Linux (Yocto), C/C++, Linux kernel security patching |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech | Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking, Consumer Electronics |
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions is a 200+ person embedded and full-stack engineering firm founded in 2007 and headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany, London, United Kingdom, and Kraków, Poland. At 200+ people, it sits well above the smallest boutiques on this list but far below the multi-thousand-engineer generalist firms — a size where embedded is still unambiguously the firm's core business, not one line item competing for resourcing against unrelated business units, while still having enough bench depth (electrical engineering, firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, connectivity, edge AI, cybersecurity) to staff a program with several parallel workstreams. ISO 9001/27001/13485 certification and named clients (Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, Bosch Rexroth) back the claim with checkable references rather than scale alone.
Timesys
Timesys Corporation was founded in 1996 by principals associated with Carnegie Mellon University's real-time systems research and built one of the first real-time-enhanced embedded Linux distributions. Headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania with roughly 60 employees, the company's specialty — embedded Linux security patching and long-term maintenance — is a specific, underserved niche most generalist firms treat as an afterthought. In December 2023, Lynx Software Technologies acquired Timesys; buyers should confirm directly how much of the original specialist team and focus remains post-acquisition, since integration into a larger organization is exactly the kind of dilution risk a boutique buyer is trying to avoid by choosing a specialist in the first place.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | ✓ | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | N/A |
| Verilog | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Technical consulting, Team extension, End-to-end product development | Engineering services, Tooling/licensing |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics | Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking |
| Best use cases | Programs needing specialist embedded depth with enough bench strength for several concurrent workstreams, Medical device development requiring ISO 13485/IEC 62304-aligned quality management from a dedicated embedded team | Products with long product-support commitments needing ongoing embedded Linux CVE monitoring and patching from a dedicated specialist, Real-time Linux systems needing specialist kernel-level engineering from a team with research-grade origins |
| Typical project type | Technical consulting | Engineering services |
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Large enough (200+) to staff multiple parallel workstreams without embedded competing internally against unrelated business units for resourcing |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications give a specific, checkable quality signal beyond team size alone |
| + | Named clients (Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, Bosch Rexroth) support reference-checking before committing |
| + | Full IP and source code transfer to the client on delivery, standard across every engagement |
| + | Named public case studies with specific outcomes rather than generic capability claims |
| - | Does not manufacture at scale — teams wanting one specialist agency through mass production will still need a separate manufacturing partner |
| - | Does not carry regulatory certification itself — supports documentation but the client retains ownership of the certification process |
| - | No published rate card — cost comparison against smaller boutiques or larger generalists requires a direct quote |
| Timesys | |
|---|---|
| + | Explicit specialty in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring) that most embedded agencies, boutique or generalist, treat as an afterthought |
| + | Carnegie Mellon-linked founding team gives the company real-time Linux research credibility dating to the mid-1990s |
| + | Long operating history (since 1996) means extensive documentation and tooling maturity |
| - | Acquired by Lynx Software Technologies in December 2023 — confirm directly how much of the original specialist team and focus remains, since post-acquisition dilution is a real risk for boutique-specialist buyers |
| - | Team size (~60) caps capacity for large concurrent programs relative to bigger engineering firms |
| - | No public pricing or minimum engagement figures for pre-qualification |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: programs needing specialist embedded depth with enough bench strength for several concurrent workstreams.
Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech.
Who should choose Timesys?
A typical fit: products with long product-support commitments needing ongoing embedded Linux CVE monitoring and patching from a dedicated specialist.
Nearly three-decade specialization in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring) most generalist firms treat as an afterthought, now under Lynx Software Technologies. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking, Consumer Electronics.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Timesys (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Timesys fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Programs needing specialist embedded depth with enough bench strength for several concurrent workstreams | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Medical device development requiring ISO 13485/IEC 62304-aligned quality management from a dedicated embedded team | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Products with long product-support commitments needing ongoing embedded Linux CVE monitoring and patching from a dedicated specialist | Limited | Strong | Timesys |
| Real-time Linux systems needing specialist kernel-level engineering from a team with research-grade origins | Limited | Strong | Timesys |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Development projects. Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients.
Timesys (4.2/5) is worth a look if you need real-time Linux systems needing specialist kernel-level engineering from a team with research-grade origins. If your situation matches that, Timesys is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Timesys?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: large enough (200+) to staff multiple parallel workstreams without embedded competing internally against unrelated business units for resourcing. Timesys's strongest advantage: explicit specialty in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring) that most embedded agencies, boutique or generalist, treat as an afterthought.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Timesys differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Timesys uses engineering services, tooling licenses pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Timesys?
Timesys is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Timesys?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients. Timesys's primary differentiator is: nearly three-decade specialization in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring) most generalist firms treat as an afterthought, now under Lynx Software Technologies. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers) vs Industrial IoT, Medical devices).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.