Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Luxoft (3.5/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for teams wanting specialist depth with capacity for multi-workstream programs. Luxoft is the stronger option for automotive OEMs needing infotainment and digital cockpit software at DXC scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2000 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Zug, Switzerland |
| Team size | 200+ | 18,000 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients | Nearly 18,000 people under DXC Technology — well past generalist scale, where the real question is whether the pre-acquisition automotive specialization survived integration |
| Pricing model | Technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development | Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Embedded Linux (Yocto) | Embedded Linux, Android Automotive, C/C++ |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech | Automotive |
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions is a 200+ person embedded and full-stack engineering firm founded in 2007 and headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany, London, United Kingdom, and Kraków, Poland. At 200+ people, it sits well above the smallest boutiques on this list but far below the multi-thousand-engineer generalist firms — a size where embedded is still unambiguously the firm's core business, not one line item competing for resourcing against unrelated business units, while still having enough bench depth (electrical engineering, firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, connectivity, edge AI, cybersecurity) to staff a program with several parallel workstreams. ISO 9001/27001/13485 certification and named clients (Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, Bosch Rexroth) back the claim with checkable references rather than scale alone.
Luxoft
Luxoft, founded in 2000, became a recognized automotive software systems integrator before DXC Technology acquired it in 2019. At nearly 18,000 people under a large enterprise IT parent, this is well past generalist scale — the real question for a buyer is whether pre-acquisition Luxoft's automotive specialization survived integration into DXC's much larger enterprise IT portfolio, worth confirming directly rather than assuming from the brand name.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | ✓ | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | N/A |
| Verilog | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Technical consulting, Team extension, End-to-end product development | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics | Automotive |
| Best use cases | Programs needing specialist embedded depth with enough bench strength for several concurrent workstreams, Medical device development requiring ISO 13485/IEC 62304-aligned quality management from a dedicated embedded team | In-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit programs needing Android Automotive expertise, OEM programs wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers |
| Typical project type | Technical consulting | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Large enough (200+) to staff multiple parallel workstreams without embedded competing internally against unrelated business units for resourcing |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications give a specific, checkable quality signal beyond team size alone |
| + | Named clients (Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, Bosch Rexroth) support reference-checking before committing |
| + | Full IP and source code transfer to the client on delivery, standard across every engagement |
| + | Named public case studies with specific outcomes rather than generic capability claims |
| - | Does not manufacture at scale — teams wanting one specialist agency through mass production will still need a separate manufacturing partner |
| - | Does not carry regulatory certification itself — supports documentation but the client retains ownership of the certification process |
| - | No published rate card — cost comparison against smaller boutiques or larger generalists requires a direct quote |
| Luxoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Automotive software deployed in over 50 million vehicles, with partnerships across 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers |
| + | Named in-vehicle infotainment platform (AMBER) demonstrates active investment in digital cockpit software |
| + | Nearly 18,000-person international workforce across 44 cities supports globally distributed OEM programs |
| - | Acquired by DXC Technology in 2019 — confirm directly whether pre-acquisition Luxoft's automotive specialization has been preserved inside DXC's much larger enterprise IT portfolio |
| - | Automotive-only embedded focus means no relevant track record outside the automotive vertical |
| - | No public pricing or minimum engagement figures published |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: programs needing specialist embedded depth with enough bench strength for several concurrent workstreams.
Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech.
Who should choose Luxoft?
A typical fit: in-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit programs needing Android Automotive expertise.
Nearly 18,000 people under DXC Technology — well past generalist scale, where the real question is whether the pre-acquisition automotive specialization survived integration. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Luxoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Luxoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Luxoft (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Luxoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Programs needing specialist embedded depth with enough bench strength for several concurrent workstreams | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Medical device development requiring ISO 13485/IEC 62304-aligned quality management from a dedicated embedded team | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| In-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit programs needing Android Automotive expertise | Limited | Strong | Luxoft |
| OEM programs wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers | Limited | Strong | Luxoft |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Development projects. Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients.
Luxoft (3.5/5) is worth a look if you need OEM programs wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers. If your situation matches that, Luxoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Luxoft?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: large enough (200+) to staff multiple parallel workstreams without embedded competing internally against unrelated business units for resourcing. Luxoft's strongest advantage: automotive software deployed in over 50 million vehicles, with partnerships across 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Luxoft differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Luxoft uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Luxoft?
Luxoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Luxoft?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients. Luxoft's primary differentiator is: nearly 18,000 people under DXC Technology — well past generalist scale, where the real question is whether the pre-acquisition automotive specialization survived integration. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 18,000), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers) vs Automotive).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.