Lemberg Solutions vs Integra Sources: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Integra Sources (4.3/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for teams wanting specialist depth with capacity for multi-workstream programs. Integra Sources is the stronger option for early-stage teams wanting one small agency for hardware and firmware. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Integra Sources: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2014 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Astana, Kazakhstan |
| Team size | 200+ | 11–50 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients | Turnkey hardware-plus-firmware delivery from a single small team, removing the need to coordinate separate hardware and firmware agencies |
| Pricing model | Technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development | Fixed project |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Embedded Linux (Yocto) | C/C++, FreeRTOS, Embedded Linux |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech | Consumer Electronics, Robotics, Industrial IoT, Medical devices |
Lemberg Solutions vs Integra Sources: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions is a 200+ person embedded and full-stack engineering firm founded in 2007 and headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany, London, United Kingdom, and Kraków, Poland. At 200+ people, it sits well above the smallest boutiques on this list but far below the multi-thousand-engineer generalist firms — a size where embedded is still unambiguously the firm's core business, not one line item competing for resourcing against unrelated business units, while still having enough bench depth (electrical engineering, firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, connectivity, edge AI, cybersecurity) to staff a program with several parallel workstreams. ISO 9001/27001/13485 certification and named clients (Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, Bosch Rexroth) back the claim with checkable references rather than scale alone.
Integra Sources
Integra Sources, founded in 2014, is a compact custom hardware and firmware shop with public sources disagreeing on both its exact headquarters (most list Astana, Kazakhstan) and current headcount (roughly 24 to 51 employees, depending on the source). At this size, turnkey delivery — electronic design, PCB layout, FPGA, embedded firmware, and kernel/driver development for Windows, Linux, macOS, and Android — all under one small team is the actual value proposition: no coordinating separate hardware and software agencies, which matters more for a startup buyer than choosing between generalist scale options.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Integra Sources
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✗ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Integra Sources
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | ✓ | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | N/A |
| Verilog | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Integra Sources
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Technical consulting, Team extension, End-to-end product development | Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Integra Sources
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics | Consumer Electronics, Robotics, Industrial IoT |
| Best use cases | Programs needing specialist embedded depth with enough bench strength for several concurrent workstreams, Medical device development requiring ISO 13485/IEC 62304-aligned quality management from a dedicated embedded team | Early-stage hardware startups without an in-house team to coordinate separate electrical and firmware agencies, Prototype and MVP development needing both hardware and firmware turned around by one accountable small team |
| Typical project type | Technical consulting | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs Integra Sources: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Large enough (200+) to staff multiple parallel workstreams without embedded competing internally against unrelated business units for resourcing |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications give a specific, checkable quality signal beyond team size alone |
| + | Named clients (Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, Bosch Rexroth) support reference-checking before committing |
| + | Full IP and source code transfer to the client on delivery, standard across every engagement |
| + | Named public case studies with specific outcomes rather than generic capability claims |
| - | Does not manufacture at scale — teams wanting one specialist agency through mass production will still need a separate manufacturing partner |
| - | Does not carry regulatory certification itself — supports documentation but the client retains ownership of the certification process |
| - | No published rate card — cost comparison against smaller boutiques or larger generalists requires a direct quote |
| Integra Sources | |
|---|---|
| + | One team handles electronic design, PCB layout, FPGA, and firmware without the client coordinating separate hardware and software agencies |
| + | 250+ completed projects reported despite a small team size, suggesting efficient project turnover for a boutique this size |
| + | Kernel/driver development spans four major operating systems (Windows, Linux, macOS, Android), broader OS coverage than most similarly sized boutiques |
| - | Public sources disagree on both headquarters location and headcount, making delivery capacity harder to verify precisely |
| - | Small team size limits fit for programs needing multiple concurrent workstreams |
| - | No public case studies with named enterprise clients to independently verify scale claims |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: programs needing specialist embedded depth with enough bench strength for several concurrent workstreams.
Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech.
Who should choose Integra Sources?
A typical fit: early-stage hardware startups without an in-house team to coordinate separate electrical and firmware agencies.
Turnkey hardware-plus-firmware delivery from a single small team, removing the need to coordinate separate hardware and firmware agencies. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer Electronics, Robotics, Industrial IoT, Medical devices.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Integra Sources
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Integra Sources |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Integra Sources (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Integra Sources
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Integra Sources fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Programs needing specialist embedded depth with enough bench strength for several concurrent workstreams | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Medical device development requiring ISO 13485/IEC 62304-aligned quality management from a dedicated embedded team | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Early-stage hardware startups without an in-house team to coordinate separate electrical and firmware agencies | Limited | Strong | Integra Sources |
| Prototype and MVP development needing both hardware and firmware turned around by one accountable small team | Limited | Strong | Integra Sources |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Integra Sources
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Development projects. Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients.
Integra Sources (4.3/5) is worth a look if you need prototype and MVP development needing both hardware and firmware turned around by one accountable small team. If your situation matches that, Integra Sources is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Integra Sources FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Integra Sources?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: large enough (200+) to staff multiple parallel workstreams without embedded competing internally against unrelated business units for resourcing. Integra Sources's strongest advantage: one team handles electronic design, PCB layout, FPGA, and firmware without the client coordinating separate hardware and software agencies.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Integra Sources differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Integra Sources uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Integra Sources?
Integra Sources is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Integra Sources?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients. Integra Sources's primary differentiator is: turnkey hardware-plus-firmware delivery from a single small team, removing the need to coordinate separate hardware and firmware agencies. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 11–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers) vs Consumer Electronics, Robotics).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.